You are asking two questions. The first question is obviously that our board of directors has the obligation and fiduciary responsibility to examine any offer that Mr. Icahn makes. If, as part of that, he were to say some things or make some offers that would be of obvious benefit to Canada that one could actually quantify, that one could actually believe would really happen, then obviously that perhaps would change our position.
What is kind of interesting about your question is this, and really I think the issue here in front of the committee is that we're asking the committee to review what we've actually done here in Canada. What Mr. Icahn, the Icahn Group, is asking for is for you to believe actually what he said. If you actually even review his recent history in terms of what he said in Canada, what he said at the British Columbia Securities Commission, basically was, “I will not extend my offer”, and he has extended it three times. He said, “I will not raise my price”, and he raised his price. He said he would not reduce his minimum condition, but he has just recently reduced his minimum condition. The effect of that is very significant because what he has created--and I know that is not the purpose of this committee--by reducing the minimum condition is essentially a creeping takeover.
Again, I would ask you, sir, to think about exactly what we have done in Canada, not what we're telling you we're going to do, and frankly, not what Mr. Icahn is telling you he will do.