May I add to that? I really think you're right in saying that the net benefit test is what the Investment Canada Act and Heritage Canada have to deal with, and I think that there is an obvious comparison to be made here. Sometimes people talk about things such as supporting film festivals or internships or those kinds of things; they're all very nice to do, but I think it's important to remember that Lionsgate has produced $800 million worth of film and television in this country.
That's the bar we set. That's the test that has to be met, and I think a net benefit means a contribution larger than $800 million. I don't see that one as a fudgeable. It's not “we might do this or that”. We have a track record, and I think that's what you have to test against.