Just to add to that, the reason we're having this conversation with this committee is that it is a cultural industry. I think it's absolutely crucial that everybody understand that the rules that are set here today and applied by the minister are rules that are part of an enormously complicated fabric of structures that support Canadian cultural industries, and when you pick apart one little part and say “foreign ownership is not such a bad thing for cultural industries and let's just not pay attention to it”, you unwind that fabric.
Your colleague suggests that this is a very powerful company that has come out of a small country. It takes an enormous amount of effort on behalf of the government of the day to continue to ensure that we have these kinds of companies in Canada. I urge everybody not to lose sight of... It may seem that it's just a business deal; that it means nothing, it's just some jobs, maybe not a lot, who knows? But at the end of the day we're supporting Canadian culture; that's what it's about. That's why net benefit applies in this case and maybe not in some other businesses that are being taken over.
That's why we ask the question: is this serving the people of Canada? I would just say that culturally we cannot afford to ignore the fact that this is one of the primary cultural industries in this country.