Thank you.
We've had the example of this great digital realm being like the Canadian Pacific Railway, yet it seems to me we continue to move on the idea that digital culture is something to be contained, as if we didn't want the railway to compete with the teamster horses so we have to limit how many tracks we're going to have.
Ms. Moore, I'd like to go to you on this. It seems to me that the notion of lifelong learning through digital education is crucial, yet we see with the imposition of digital locks. Rights that educators or students would normally have can be erased, and within Bill C-32 we actually see the provision of having to destroy class notes after 30 days because keeping your class notes would be some kind of threat.
I'd like to ask what you think of that. We look at our WIPO-compliant competitors, and within WIPO the digital lock provisions are really clear. Article 10 of the WIPO copyright treaty says that you can't use these measures like digital locks to override rights to normal use of a work. How do you think that allowing a software code designed by a corporation to limit, to deny, to exclude any kind of access arbitrarily will interfere with our ability to set up a truly forward-looking knowledge regime?