We have brought them back some way. They're prepared--I think they testified in front of this committee--to support the levy insofar as it doesn't provide a haven for file sharing. That has been their position all along, I think, although it was articulated more recently.
That's really our position too, honestly. As I said before, we think that the judgment was in error. We think that private copying is a necessity. It should apply to DARs. There are countries in the world, such as France, that have very rigorous copyright enforcement regimes and private copying levies levied on DARs, and they seem to coexist quite well.
As I say, I think CRIA has made some progress towards a position that at least recognizes the need in Canada for this revenue stream, but it wants to limit its application so that it doesn't imply that copyright infringement is justified under that regime. That's what I understand their position to be.