The questions and analogies you raise are the exact reasons we decided we would include broadband in our current review of what should be included in basic telecommunication services. What speeds there should be, what the target should be, how fast we should roll out: all those things are currently on the table in the proceedings that we've been hearing. We've heard a wide variety of testimony, and as you say, some don't think there's any role for the CRTC or really, for that matter, government, besides maybe setting an overall general strategy of what the target should be while letting the private sector and market forces do their work. Arguably, there have been some strides made in Canada to roll out broadband to Canadians.
There are others, of course, who, like you, are putting out on the table the targets they've come up with in other countries. They're clearly in front of us, and there is a wide variety of targets. Some have come forward and said it should be 100 megabits by 2015 or 2020 and have compared that to what the Australians have done. They have compared it to the broadband strategy they came up with in the U.S., that very shortly it should be four megabits, and then we should have a further strategy to get us to 100 megabits for a certain percentage of the population by a certain timeframe. All those things are in front of us, and we agree that this is important, and that's why we're taking a look at it right now.