First of all, it's not fee-for-carriage; it's value-for-signal. As you know, we have said that the broadcasters and distributors should negotiate what is the value of the signal that's being distributed. We don't see why.... The distributors pay for the specialty signal and they don't pay for the over-the-air signal. We've made a reference to the court, saying, “Here is the scheme that we would implement” and asking them to tell us if it legal or not.
Because many people appearing before us have said no, this is copyright, and you're interfering with copyright. They have said that this not broadcasting. That argument was debated before the court. Part of industry said it was copyright; part of it said it was not. We await the outcome.
If they say, “Yes, CRTC, you have the power, and you can do it”, all we would do then is establish the fee. It's up to them to decide whether to negotiate it or not, etc. Now that in the interim we have this vertical integration where most of the major broadcasters are owned by the distributors, those negotiations may take a totally different form from what you see in the U.S.
I have no idea what they will do. It's up to them to decide. All I do is set the fee if the court says we have the power to do so.