Certainly I've heard that example already, and it was in another context, so it seems to me that there may be some abusive practices.
I'm interested in this issue because there are elements that are within the role of the industry. Producers probably always fight with the writers, who always fight with the broadcasters. That's common in the business. But what we want to ensure from the investments that we make is that we have a competition and creativity, that we have a diversity of voice. Mr. von Finckenstein says, “Well, there are many voices out there”. Certainly there are blogs; there's Facebook. My kids watch YouTube all the time, but that's not what we're talking about. We're talking about the investment that the Canadian public makes. It's a substantive investment: the Canada Media Fund, the video tax credit, section 19.1 of the tax act, the massive investment we make in Telefilm and the National Film Board. We are players at the table. And now, as we see a vertically integrated company that is now being able to offer phone service with content, we want to make sure that with what we've paid for with the taxpayers' money, through independent production, through in-house production, or however it is, we have the diversity of voice and we have complete access. I'm concerned, given the experience of the industry, whether or not that access is going to remain and our public trust is going to be kept up to the level it needs to be.
I'd like to ask you, Madame Samson, if you think we need to put some clear rules down.