The CRTC has taken the view that they want to see an agreement on terms of trade, and they're encouraging the parties to come to the table. They're requiring the broadcasters to have an agreement in place when they come for the group licence hearings in the spring. So that's very positive.
But as you know, the commission and the chair have consistently said they like to interfere as little as possible in market forces and they want to use a light hand. They would prefer to see us come to an agreement and do a deal. They've said that if a deal is not done, they will have to consider what conditions they may impose on the producers and the broadcasters with regard to rights sharing. So there's that threat—maybe that's too strong a word, but there's the potential there. So that's motivation for both parties to try to reach a deal.
Ultimately, if we can't reach a deal, if the broadcasters continue to try to negotiate an arrangement that's not measurable and not enforceable, just a statement of overarching principles—which isn't what we need, we need something concrete—then we'll certainly be arguing to the commission that they need to put something in place that has meaning and can be enforced and regulated.