The first thing is that Shaw and Quebecor have continued their contributions to the fund. Some changes, which are working well, were made last year around allowances for a broadcaster affiliated in-house. Neither the alarm that was expressed at the time from the independent production community nor the need that was expressed from the broadcast sector seem have been borne out. Historically we're seeing traditional amounts of broadcaster in-house and affiliated that have been in existence at the fund for quite some time, at least on the affiliated side. I think things have calmed down quite a bit from the days when the real friction hit.
In terms of the issue of exclusivity, obviously that's out of our control. It's not something we can weigh into in terms of the fight or the debate. Our mandate is for content to be seen and accessible to Canadians anywhere, any time, anyplace. We still think that's a very important mandate, and I believe there are some protections around exclusivity in the current CRTC regulatory environment.
Sandra or Stéphane might want to add to that.
Certainly for us, any environment that allows this content to be broadly distributed among Canadians is the best environment, because our interest is in making sure that content can be seen by the most people. It's just not us who can regulate or control that.