Okay. Well, when Konrad von Finckenstein was here, I made it pretty clear to him. I said Bell now owns them, their position was clear, and you can drop the court case. We don't need to go through this; we don't need to continue down.... Because my concern has always been on the side of Canadian consumers, and I've made that clear. I think Canadian consumers are frankly very frustrated. They're very concerned with the amount of money that's leaving their household; they're concerned about bills, debt loads, and all these sorts of things. I'm sensitive to those things.
Just last week we had a whole number of independent broadcasters here who were talking about how we need to open up 9(1)(h) licences. That's a solution for independent broadcasters. I said to them, personally I see where the future's going, and that's not the future. This was really important in 1990, might have been really important in 2000, and in 2010 it might be important until 2012—because the future is going wireless. Everything that CTV plays, I will be able to watch. In fact, when TSN has a great hockey game on, I hope to be able to watch it wherever I am, on a device like the one you have with you, over my wireless network, and it will be streaming in HD. That's the future, and it's not that far away.
So what I need to understand, and this is my position, is that we need an environment in which we're protecting consumers. I think this is what Bell's position was. I hope it's the prevailing position, and I would hope that Bell would indicate to Mr. von Finckenstein that its position hasn't changed, because I thought it was a position of principle.
That's my position on it.