I don't actually believe that. I think what you would end up with is one act that has two sections, because one is culturally driven and one is economically driven in its main priorities; one promotes open competition and the other promotes limited competition to ensure the achievement of cultural objectives. Put the two acts together and you really have two competing things in one page.
To be clear, if somebody provides a television service on a wireless device, that service itself is subject to the jurisdiction of the CRTC under the Broadcasting Act. They have simply, to date, decided to forebear from regulation. They could regulate it. I don't think it's necessary at this point, but the jurisdiction does exist.
What they don't regulate is the totality of the business of the wireless carrier, and that's probably a good thing. At the end of the day, I don't think the issue is whether you actually regulate in detail the broadcaster, but whether the consumer has access to the content and independent producers have the ability to provide their content and have it displayed on all platforms.
I think that's where we want to get to: to that form of openness, so that Canadians and Canadian producers can use the system, whether it's by the Internet, wireless, or the traditional platforms, to reach out to the world, and by reaching out to the world I think we start to create more financially viable models that aren't reliant on subsidy.