Pardon me, but I was waiting for the translation.
Yes I have another question, but I'm sure it won't take long. Whatever the case may be, thank you for the chance to ask it.
Can we consider other revenue sources? Because cash flow is currently being diverted. Things are being offered on the Internet for which people are paying more. After watching a television series on the Internet, such as Flashpoint, for example, people receive a bill for $47 from their cable company—that's Videotron at my home. I swear this has already happened, in particular to my assistant, who lives in Saint-Hubert. He watched the series Les Invincibles, and that cost him $47. He paid the cable company that amount, whereas, if he had bought the series at HMV, for example, it would have cost him exactly the same price, but the money would have gone to the producer, not to the cable company.
Shouldn't we require the cable providers or the BDUs, whichever they are, to pay any surplus money made from the use of content such as that into a kind of cultural production fund?