Needless to say, again, you're asking a hypothetical about a cultural exemption that has not yet been completed and negotiated.
To give you an example of the concerns they raise, it has been our practice in the past, for example, to have a cultural exemption that says all chapters of this agreement are exempt insofar as it might affect cultural industries. But we're going to have a chapter on intellectual property, so they posed the question--and we're getting kind of philosophical here--if you're going to have protections for artists through an intellectual property chapter, then why are you going to exempt them in the name of protecting culture? We're getting into the philosophy of asking, are you protecting artists by exempting them from their own protections?
These are the kinds of concerns we're talking about. In the end, it really comes down to how you draft an agreement to best protect the culture. But again, the direction they are coming from is one where their interests are actually quite aligned with us. In fact, the European Union and Canada have quite commonly been partners in larger multilateral organizations in trying to advance...we have worked together closely to advance the interests of maintaining cultural exemptions in multilateral agreements.