We see a couple of different approaches. Historically, the regulation of Canadian content has been on two fronts. One is the supply side and the other is the demand side.
On the supply side, we've had a system of government subsidies, tax incentives, and all that stuff for the creation of Canadian content. I'm not saying that any of it needs to fall by the wayside; there's still a case for the subsidization of Canadian content or the continuation of tax incentives for the creation of professional content. I don't see any problem with that. In fact, the more content the better, from the perspective of intermediaries. On the demand side, when we're regulating the demand part--that is, with quotas--I think quotas are going to be increasingly unsustainable, frankly.
The other component is the regulation of the open Internet. This is what the CRTC grappled with in its Internet traffic management proceedings last year. It came up with a set of rules that required ISPs to more or less treat all traffic alike. That's the Reader's Digest version. Rules like that are important, because they mean that Canadian producers can have their Canadian content travel just as fast and reach just the same audiences as big Hollywood content and big Hollywood producers. This is why, for example, groups like CFTPA and ACTRA and others were supporting the so-called net neutrality rule at the CRTC.