I think 3-D TV represents a tremendous opportunity for all sorts of players in this space, because it's cool and people are going to like it. It's going to be a new way of experiencing audiovisual content.
It is going to take up a lot more bandwidth, as you rightly identified. I don't know about spectrum, but bandwidth, so one of the things we are going to need is a better, faster broadband infrastructure in our country in order to support 3-D television across the country.
This is not just a 3-D TV issue, by the way, but we'll stick with the 3-D TV example. If you don't want to have a 3-D TV digital divide, that is, where people in Toronto, Montreal, and Ottawa get 3-D TV, but people in Rimouski and northern Manitoba don't, we're going to need to think about making sure that the communications infrastructure exists.
Again, on some of the questions that other members have had about the role of government, I think there is a role for government to play in ensuring that we have the best broadband infrastructure in the world. That will act as the underlying network for all of these communication technologies that we've talked about. One of the implications of the virtuous hourglass is that if everything is being carried over the public Internet, we need a really, really fast, open, and reliable public Internet going everywhere.