Let me first say that we agree with you that we are investing much more heavily in the digital arena than in new specialty channels, especially given that specialty channels more or less fund themselves. Radio-Canada's Artv model is self-financed through fees and advertising revenues. So the bulk of our investment goes into the digital platform, more specifically as it relates to regional, kids' and cultural services. We are trying hard to bring Canada into the digital age, something that is very important to us.
However, the current economic model does favour the creation of specialty channels a lot more. It is my belief that, in 5 to 10 years, the real economic model, the one that will allow us to strike a balance, will be based on specialty channels.
To create those specialty channels, Radio-Canada is capitalizing on each of the strengths of its main network. For example, information becomes RDI; culture becomes Artv; health, the environment, nature and topics covered by our science programs become S.E.N.S., which gives us an idea of what it will look like as a TV channel. And channels dedicated to other specific areas will eventually follow. We can assume that these will be extremely sound models in 5 to 10 years because that is already the case.
I would just add that if the shift to digital does take place, we will be totally ready to get on board, because we will have already developed models, such as TOU.TV, that will really help us make the transition quickly.
I wand to end by saying that television has a bright future; the television set, however, has some challenges ahead. So when a new television channel is launched, it will be broadcast on the appropriate medium. We are not concerned about whether or not that medium will be a television set, but we are concerned about launching that channel.