Thank you.
Thank you for your presentation today.
It's interesting; there seems to be....
Frankly, I don't share a lot of the concern that deals with digital transition. If you compare Canada with the United States, for example, when digital transition occurred there, they didn't have the kind of connectivity that we have in Canada between television viewers and BDUs. We know that 93% of all households are connected to a BDU, be it satellite or cable. We don't know what percentage of the remaining 7% even watch television. So I would argue that in Canada we have very good coverage.
Perhaps you could talk a little bit to the committee about this aspect. I'm aware that obviously you're currently reviewing the Bell purchase of CTV. I think that's something we've taken a supportive position on in our party. Certainly when Shaw bought Global they did make specific considerations for digital transitions for customers who could be affected, not just by providing satellite dishes but also by providing the installation at no charge.
Now, when I was kid growing up on a farm, I remember that with a set of rabbit ears we could get one station in, kind of fuzzy. My parents, back in the seventies, put in an antenna, which cost a lot of money, so that we could get channels. So the signal may have been free, but the apparatus was not.
This is even better. Not only will they get a very clear signal, but they won't even pay for the equipment to connect. I thought that was a pretty good gesture on behalf of Shaw, and a pretty good measure that the CRTC took in terms of actually guaranteeing that viewers in those areas would in fact still receive television signal.
Could you expand on that a little bit?