I'm not sure I agree that just because the CRTC expected it from Shaw this time around, they will next time. In our experience as community broadcasters over the years, there used to be very high expectations of cable companies on the delivery of community television service, and over the years it's simply eroded. As well, if it's not a political priority at the time, nothing happens, so I don't agree with you there with Bell and CTV, whereas Shaw....
We don't think these suggestions for public tangible benefits come from nowhere. We believe they come out of informal conversations between the CRTC and these companies. When Shaw put forward their public benefits package, at that time there did seem to be a strong CRTC direction to encourage multiplexing, the kind of thing I'm talking about with community broadcasters so that local communities could share channels in a tight spectrum. That was in the Shaw deal, as well as this satellite arrangement. Bell and CTV initially had offered the same things, but they have taken it off the table, so I'm not sure there is the same direction this time around; in the same way, last summer the CRTC was advocating for a government-led education campaign, and now they're not.