You said it was only 200,000 homes, but really what we're talking about is the homes that cannot receive a digital signal for whatever reason. They're in an area the CRTC has looked at and where the CRTC has said, “We're not going to make you install this digital transmitter in this region, which means you will not receive digital signal”. In those areas they have indicated they won't see you left without service. Our concern is with those who would be impacted, i.e., they would no longer have any signal. In think that is why they've gone with a very targeted approach.
If you look at it and say they are ensuring through this very targeted approach that the people who are impacted directly are going to be looked after, if we went with a pan-Canadian view on this and said we were just going to throw it out right across Canada, invariably we'd be taking in well in excess of 90% of households that watch television that aren't looking for a program, that aren't going to be impacted by the transition at all. I'm just curious as to what is wrong with the targeted approach to this when it seems that a targeted approach is, in fact, what's needed?