Here's also my concern, though, in terms of looking at this, because my colleague said we're dealing with acquired rights versus the privilege to use that right. But you're also competing against a phenomenal amount of product that is now being put out there.
As I said, my magazine posted stuff. When I ran a magazine, the going fee for a photograph was $140 if I wanted to use it, whether it was a good photograph or not. Now there's flickr. Flickr has posted millions of photos from people who don't want compensation. If I were running a magazine now, I could get a lot of copies, a lot of photographs, for free, unless I was dealing with a heavy-duty professional who I was paying.
Is that not part of the issue? We're dealing with people posting academic articles. They're putting up research. They're giving it out into a general comment. How do we then maintain a market so that we can continue to create?