But it was defined by the Supreme Court, so it's the elephant in the room that we have to deal with. These are rights that exist. So how do we go about...? This is the point of this discussion: how do we move forward?
If we have a levy in place.... I think a levy is a great idea. My colleagues call it a tax, but I think a levy is a reasonable way that artists get paid. But if we have a levy, do we then need the exhaustive list? For example, in 1997 the Copyright Act decided that it was legal to take an easel and a blackboard and make a quote.
Do we need to enforce that level of enforceability of artists' rights if we're going to have a levy? It seems to me that we either go one way or the other. We either go after everything that's happening in the classroom and tick it off, or we say, “Here's a levy, students, you use it”.