Thank you for the question.
The philosophy that is growing is one of looking at the existing state of infrastructure in the country, and in Prince Edward Island specifically, and asking if we need to build and create new problems that all of us as public officials have to monitor very closely. When we look across the breadth of existing organizations--the Trans Canada Trail is an excellent one--we think there are a lot of winners existing that need strengthening and support. As a philosophy, we are suggesting that perhaps we should think of legacy in a different way.
There's an example in Prince Edward Island that best illustrates it. There's a movement afoot to create a new provincial museum in the province of P.E.I. I will not get into that debate, but we have a decentralized system of heritage right now in P.E.I. There are seven historic sites across the island. They are all in desperate need of programming and capital dollars.
As a thought, instead of creating a new museum with new management, new expenses, and new funding requests, we're suggesting as one concept that we build on the existing seven sites across the province. They are in rural parts of the province and they reflect all cultures on Prince Edward Island. That's an example, Mr. Armstrong, of that philosophy of supporting existing infrastructure.