Thank you very much for the question.
I should say at the outset that I wasn't directly involved in the engagement process leading up to the 2010 Olympics. Certainly there was a tremendous outreach. The areas you indicated, the robust opening and closing ceremonies, were significant.
Equally significant, if not more so, was the treatment of the four host first nation communities around that area. As heads of state, because we were in their territory, they were welcoming people from across the world to their territories. They actually had a significant role in sitting with the Governor General and with other heads of delegations in attending those appropriate events and being treated as such. It certainly set a high-water mark with respect to their participation.
I will say that there was a lot of engagement leading up to the Olympics--for sure. There was an excellent outreach process that was utilized in terms of a number of activities leading up to that, including days for first nations children to come out. There was supposed to be a legacy fund developed from some of the proceeds of the first nations-themed merchandise...well, they said it was first nations-themed merchandise, but they all had inukshuks on them, so I don't know how they all weren't first nations. But anyway, I digress. I'm sure they had some special classification.
It was a very interesting, multi-faceted engagement process, and I think it was that respect and outreach that is the primary lesson that can be learned.