Thank you.
First I would like to thank you for your patience. It is very relevant that you are here to testify on the study of the 150th anniversary. The people from the Royal Canadian Mint are here essentially to help us corroborate these celebrations. As for the representatives of the National Capital Commission, they went through a consultation process I would describe as extreme, and this is much to their credit.
In the course of the commission's work and the major public consultations it carried out, certain facts emerged, for instance the fact that some people would like to see streets named in honour of some of the legendary first nations chiefs. One can see the benefits of consultation here. However, I wonder how much autonomy you have with regard to the commemoration of the War of 1812. It has been folded into the Winterlude celebrations that are about to begin. I have some questions in that regard on your autonomy, on the consultative dimension which is absent in other regards. I wonder among other things if you would have the necessary freedom to erect a monument in honour of Tommy Douglas, who, according to a recent survey, is considered to be one of the most outstanding Canadians.
My question on consultation is for Mr. Hadsipantelis. Have you considered a method that would allow you to consult people on the choice of themes? We have often heard the term “from the ground up” mentioned here, and the fact that people should own the celebrations of the 150th anniversary. Consequently it would be good to have consultations on the overarching themes.
Some themes have been suggested. For instance, I remember that when a consultation was held on the 150th anniversary at the NAC, people said that the health insurance system was important to them and they wanted it to be commemorated, even if government representatives would like to see it disappear.
Do you consult the population on the choice of themes?