I had been under the impression that we had some form of agreement to delay this particular study until a new chair of the CRTC was in place. I thought that was the agreement among myself and the two critics. While we're not opposed to a study of this, I think it would be in our best interests as a committee to wait until the CRTC actually has a chair in place, so that he or she could be called as a witness. For that reason, I think this motion, at this time, is a bit premature.
We are prepared to vote and we will be voting against this motion at this time.