Thank you, Chair, and thank you to our guests. I've been a fan of your organization for a while. Your moniker appears on a lot of good things.
I've always wondered what it must be like to set up the criteria for what to fund and whatnot. Whenever I see your moniker now, I think to myself that it must be one challenging position to be in, given the parameters you have and the subjectivity of what it is you're funding. That being said, that's in the general sense. As far as the experimental stream is concerned, it must be even worse because of what you have to consider.
Quite simply, that's my question. What do you consider to be experimental? Once you've gone that far, what are the criteria you use to place one above the other in areas of importance?