That's bizarre. I've never pressured a museum to change an exhibit, so I don't know what that's referring to. It's true that, as you go through the Canada Hall, you get to the end of it and realize that apart from the fashions and the architecture it ends in 1980. It doesn't continue through the nineties and into the modern era.
This is a request for funding to upgrade the museum that I know existed before the current management was present at the Museum of Civilization. I know the NDP is not opposed to our investing this money in the museum—you just don't like to change the mandate. You yourself have acknowledged that this museum could use some updating. The Canada Hall is proof of that.
It's not just that one angle. There's also another one. Over time, inadequacies in the Canada Hall were pointed out to me when I did a tour there not long ago. Acadian Canadians have a plaque on a wall, and that's it. It's just a plaque. The story of the Acadians, the trauma they went through, which is all part of Canada's history, is not treated with real seriousness or any kind of due care. There are all kinds of examples. I've spoken to members of the board of the museum, and I can tell you that very often people put stuff in the suggestion boxes saying that this story isn't adequately told.
Having a refresh is something that is habitual, by the way, in every other museum in the country. They do this stuff all the time to make sure they're up to date, and they understand the nuances of teaching and disseminating information about history.