Just briefly, I think this may answer the question.
It would be redundant, because as we said, it's already in the Museums Act, which governs all of the museums. It's not specifically in any other particular museum description.
Again on the one hand, as Mr. Simms pointed out too, one of the motions was to stop them from doing something and tell them what they could or couldn't destroy. But on the other hand, we're asking for curatorial independence, so they're kind of at odds with each other.
I think the act itself is pretty clear that curatorial independence is guaranteed by the Museums Act. You can restate it a hundred different times, but it's pretty clear. It's right in the act.