Again, I base it on my conversations with recording industry executives. Generally, being in the industry for about 30 years now, I find that people lamented the fact that artists weren't making money 20 years ago, because most artists never made money. The record labels, when they gave an artist, for instance, a $0.5 million recording contract, the artist ended up in some cases with zero, because all the money went to marketing, the creation, the production, and so on.
Really, back then they said, “We're going to create this record but really the record will only gain you notoriety to go out and play live music and get money there.” Well, that hasn't changed. It's still the same. The artist is still not making any money. They're making money from their live performance.
I think that's really my point here. The proliferation of music is not really about the money the artists are making. It's about their desire to make music. And the proliferation of people listening to music is not about having to pay for it, it's about their interest in wanting to listen to music. So it's not really being driven by funding or money.