It's actually all of the above. The service was designed deliberately to be fairly comprehensive. It's one of the reasons why negotiations with all of the relevant collectives took some time. The subscription element is basically a streaming service, but it also allows you to “pin” the copies of the songs you want so that you can actually have them stored locally on your phone.
Also, if you are listening to songs frequently, it will automatically store locally on your phone so it won't eat up your data plan. It's actually a feature that just stays within the closed system. You can actually mix those songs with your pre-existing, pre-owned collection. The system knows which are the all-access songs versus which are your songs, so they only stay active and usable while you actually have an active subscription.
We also offer a storefront, where we will basically sell songs between 99¢ to $1.49. Again, albums are offered at a standard $9.99 rate, mostly because we see that different markets have different needs. Not everyone wants an all-you-can-eat subscription. Again, it's a fantastic value actually. Justin took my talking point with respect to it. It represents more than 100% of the average spend, if you actually stay with a subscription service every year. Not everyone wants to do that. If you want to buy à la carte, you can do that. We don't see those as mutually exclusive services. We didn't want to launch a service where they competed, so we actually have all of them.
Similarly, there's again a cloud function where you can upload your own songs to the cloud and stream them back. Again, we have the clearances from the collectives on that as well.