[Inaudible—Editor] that comes from a sound recording, it's almost all of it, so that answers that question. If it comes out of collective initiatives, it's almost all of it.
I heard that testimony, 19,000 musicians in Canada who are underserved. If you take $4.5 million and you spread it among 19,000 people, you get about $250 apiece, so it isn't a critical amount of money.
What we do is we try to find people who are ready for the system who could use an amount of money which is reasonable to get them started in a professional environment. If people want to start a second system to help those beyond what radio does to help musicians at the earliest stages of their careers once they exit school or even younger, I think that's great.
When you start decimating funds, you start removing the opportunity from other people in the system. It's not a straight win. That's a zero sum game. You're taking money away from people who are deserving, have made a strong impression, and are developed and ready to go. I don't think it makes sense, frankly, from a funding perspective.