We sent letters to Canadian Heritage to try to at least bring these, what we consider, violations of the policy to the attention of the ministry, and the response we got back was that it doesn't apply to the studios. We think that was the wrong interpretation of the policy because it's looking at a literal interpretation as opposed to focusing on what is most important, which is the intent of the policy and what it is meant to accomplish.
Looking at a literal interpretation just cuts the legs out, and we're left in a very difficult position, and it's going to affect not just distribution. We're not just trying to protect our own businesses as distributors, although that is important to us. It is part of the fabric. As Naveen said, it's a three-legged stool and without distribution—