Thanks, Mr. Chair.
Thanks, Dan, for your presentation.
You mentioned some of the discussion that has gone on about the bill. Obviously any time people are talking, especially about private members' bills, around the country, it means there's some engagement and interest in what's transpiring here in Ottawa and on the Hill. Those discussions aren't necessarily supportive and they're not necessarily against. They fall under the realm of trying to address what's being presented, in your case this piece of legislation. One of the things I've learned since the passing of the bill at second reading is that there is a tremendous divide, if you will. A lot of folks are supportive, but a tremendous number of folks are not supportive.
One thing that folks asked me to ask you about at committee if we had the opportunity, was your consultation process. How did that begin? How did it evolve? Who did you consult with in terms of your position on the bill?