I don't necessarily disagree at all, but I'd be open to a discussion about what defines Canadian content, simply because there are too many people in this industry who are finding that they're not being supported. Co-production, as Sarah mentioned, is an excellent way to get more opportunities for Canadian artists, whether they're behind the camera or in front of the camera.
Creativity brought us something in television called the Canadian co-venture. Two of my clients at our Kipling Avenue facility are TV series financed by CBS that air on a cable network in the United States called the CW Network, but they are Canadian co-ventures, which means that they are produced by Canadians, that their either number one or number two actor has to be Canadian, and that the director of every single episode has to be a Canadian director.
The Canadian Film Centre, which graduates I don't know how many directors a year, now has a great pool of directors available to shows that are being watched by Americans. But I would argue that these Canadian directors would never have had the opportunity to direct every single episode of those TV series called Beauty and the Beast and Reign that they have as a result of this unique arrangement.
I think creativity can be a wonderful thing. Actor number one or actor number two are Canadian in both of those shows, but every single director of those episodes, which now number I think more than 80 episodes, has been Canadian. How often do Canadian directors get the opportunity to have their art watched by such huge markets?