First of all, in relation to local news, generally our position is that the local stations are in a better position to provide local news because of the history of having professionalism. It is usually labour-intensive reporting.
In regard to community stations, if they want to move into local information and local news, in our view the access programming threshold—the requirements set out by the CRTC—doesn't actually prevent Rogers from moving into local news, because the access programming just means that the idea needs to come from a community member and that the member need to be involved in producing that programming. That to us really is what a community channel is about: engaging the community members and making sure that they have a say in what's being aired on their community channel. In our view, then, there is a way to work access programming into local news.
Does that answer your question? I could also move into Roger's proposal about redistributing their 2%.