First of all, it's a great question. I think it's interesting that when you look at the key asks—if I can put it that way—that the music industry stakeholders have put forward, they in fact can be corrected with very little legislative change.
You talked about the obvious example of changing 50 to 70. It wouldn't take much to entrench the concept of technological neutrality in the Copyright Act in order to, I would expect, fix what is currently wrong with the private copying regime. That's another example of a relatively easy fix.
We think there are relatively easy fixes to the language that has proven problematic for SOCAN on the charitable exemptions issue.
I would tend to agree with my friend that often less is more. I don't think we have to bring in overwhelming changes to the legislation to address what appear to be the biggest concerns of the stakeholders in the music industry.