Well, taking private copying as an example, in part we're saying that it should be technologically neutral, because we don't know what the technology will be five or 10 years down the road. I think the fact that the act has a built-in review clause every five years is very important, and the fact that we're here today is a testament to that. We can't predict what's going to be down the road 10 or 15 years from now, but what we can do is ensure that we're on top of things as much as possible legislatively.
I would strongly recommend, then, that this five-year review continue five years from now and then again five years after that. That will, in part, ensure that we stay on top of what the trends will be going forward.