If I can add to that, just in terms of radio, I would totally agree with Solange that radio has proved to be much more resilient than people thought it would be. In 1997, at the time that neighbouring rights were brought in, they said that radio was in trouble, radio was on the way out. The total industry profits for radio in 1997 were $3.6 million. In 2016, the total industry profits were $440 million, so it's actually an industry that's getting a lot more profitable. There's been a lot of consolidation: 82% of radio is now in the hands of 10 radio groups; in 1997, only 50% was in the hands of 10 radio groups. Radio does continue to be remarkably resilient in the face of other forms, so I think it is something we still need to address.
In terms of technological neutrality, I think you've heard from me and other people in terms of changing the definition of “sound recording”. That's about neutrality. As people consume more and more recorded music through audio-visual media—and I think Artisti explained that very well, that you have a digital image, but you're listening to the music—they should be compensated for that if that's the way people are listening to it in the future. We need to fix that definition to make the consumption of music technologically neutral.
On private copying, it's the same thing. Private copying is now tied to old devices and should be applied whenever everybody is copying, today and in the future.