Yes.
Mr. Déziel proposed that citizens could deliberately add $1 to their Internet access package so that the money goes directly to the artist. The political challenge is to ensure that Internet service providers contribute to improving the remuneration of artists, but that the bill is not passed on to consumers. Mr. Déziel's idea is very good.
I have a suggestion. Why doesn't the CRTC step in to set the maximum, the ceiling price, for monthly Internet access service to ensure that providers do not pass the bill on to consumers? For example, it could be a maximum of $70 per month. It seems to me that the CRTC could have the power to intervene in contracts so that the bill is not passed on to consumers.