The question of copyright is directly related to intellectual property. Converting creative processes to property is something we've been doing for a long time. It's just not generating the same kind of revenue we wish it did. There's no question that exhibition fees are essential to the overall remuneration or support of artists; it's just not in amounts that are sufficient to provide a decent wage. I'm not calling into question copyright. I am merely saying that maybe we could be looking at other sources, maybe funds, to give copyright a bit of a top-up or boost.
It's probably too late to answer Mr. Hogg's question, but there are some models out there where a fund has been created that allows for organizations to access this fund to pay copyright or exhibition fees to artists. It's not something I have examined closely, but I'm sure there are things we could look at in terms of other experiences in other countries that might provide some perspective.