Yes, there are other examples. We'll be happy to provide them later. However, I want to point that the reason we're seeking to clarify the current text is twofold.
First, take the example of the Directors Rights Collective of Canada, which has 1,300 members. The DGC is made up of 700 directors. As a result, the collective includes directors who aren't covered by the DGC's collective agreement. This shows that, outside the framework of the collective agreement, content is being produced and directors need their rights protected.
We're seeing a second risk. Each time a new distribution platform appears, it again raises issues regarding compensation and remuneration.
We think that a clarification such as the one we're proposing would make it possible to avoid these situations in the future, including the examples you just provided. We don't have any specific requests in this regard, but this could set the stage for the future and ensure that directors and screenwriters are well compensated.