I would. In response to Mr. Knopf on the collectives issue, I just want to say that my experience with collectives has been quite different from what Mr. Knopf has described. Artists rely on collectives to do the work that they would be unable to do on their own. Most of these collectives are not-for-profits that really exist only to benefit their members and provide a valuable service. They're dealing in micropayments, and with licensing disparate uses that those rights holders wouldn't be able to license on their own.
I wanted to raise that with the committee, because my understanding of the collectives has always been that they are really doing the work to benefit their rights holders, and taking their mandate from the work that rights holders want them to do. We should be strengthening and supporting collectives, not trying to tear them down through this process. They are providing an indispensable service to artists in their remuneration.