You raise a good point, because no two litigations are the same, and you never really know what is going to happen in the context of that litigation. There are always going to be challenges presented. As you've said, even if the Copyright Act is amended to allow for de-indexing and blocking orders, there's still going to be an enforcement aspect of it.
The proposals are really about giving it some teeth so that artists have a chance of getting an effective remedy more quickly and before the harm becomes disparate. The Google and Equustek case went on for years, trying to stop the harm.
Amending the Copyright Act to allow for a rights holder or an artist to apply, within a due-process framework that clearly sets out the steps required to obtain that order, is really meant to give them that little push to get them over some of the initial hurdles, so that they can get to that relief more quickly.
I really think amending the Copyright Act would benefit that type of relief, because it takes some of the uncertainty out of the process, in terms of whether or not the court even has jurisdiction to grant that type of order. The Copyright Act will specifically provide for it, and that would be in line with what some of our international counterparts who have already taken steps to allow that type of relief have done.