Thank you very much, Ms. Levy. What you are saying is very important. We hear others saying the opposite and so I thank you for having cleared that up in this very precise way.
Ms. Couette, you mentioned that Quebec authors received fees from other countries but they receive nothing from English Canada. You also referred to the Supreme Court judgment. According to what I understand from Ms. Levy's explanation, Mr. Geist presented the same arguments before the Supreme Court. In other words, these are very intelligent people, clearly, but they are almost suggesting that the Supreme Court ruling was erroneous. Obviously, that is what was raised.
As you also said, statutory damages are ridiculous. They only correspond to the fees that should be paid. Do you see a connection? Even if it is applied, the Supreme Court ruling only leads to statutory damages, which is equivalent to paying the fee for use initial.