I'm sorry to run over time.
I'll just raise the question of whether the construction of clause 24 on research that may be undertaken by the office is too tightly framed. The use of specific examples in the subclauses will tend to limit the interpretation of the general language in the chapeau provision in the clause. I raise the question of whether the research that may be undertaken by the office is constrained, perhaps even so much so that it can't gather the pertinent information to present its mandatory annual report as required by subclause 43(1).
Again, I would urge the committee to consider those matters on drafting. They're challenging matters in terms of the specifics. The bill obviously reflects an important process and important goals that are part of reconciliation. At the same time, while I hope the bill will draw broad support from everyone, hopefully all will work to make the best of the bill that's feasible in the context of the time to consider it.
I will, of course, try to help in respect of any further questions you may wish to pose.