Okay. Sorry. I didn't hear to whom that was directed.
I actually moved quickly through the additional matters that I was raising. I think I addressed all of them quickly. The one I was speaking to near the end concerns clause 24. I just highlight briefly the way in which that clause is constructed in terms of provision. Including things within it has the danger of potentially restricting the broader term to a greater extent than it might be under some other formulation.
That was the point I was going to end on. I just did a quicker conclusion.