I would expect that we probably have witnesses, but if we don't, that would be a gap that probably should get filled, if we haven't had anyone speak to it, so I appreciate that comment.
I want to go to the testimony that we heard previously around clause 24. I was hearing what the witnesses were saying, but I wasn't reading in clause 24 what they were reading in clause 24. I interpreted it as “may do some research”. They felt it needed to be strengthened and there needed to be lots of work, similar to the granting councils. I think the language there is such that it allows for the research capacity, but it doesn't erode the respect for communities or the respect for intellectual property.
Have you looked at that section? Do you have any comments on that?