In light of that comment, maybe you could explain the following. During the election, when the National Post wrapped itself in an editorial on the front page and one of your editorial writers resigned in protest, where was the freedom? If corporate decisions for revenue override journalistic freedom—and they have at the Toronto Sun.... We know of those cases. They have at the National Post. How do you square that comment?
You claim there is editorial freedom, and yet at the same time you've had editorialists resign over the lack of editorial freedom, precisely because of the way in which you've chosen to have advertising portrayed.