I can respond. It's a common problem. We see it all the time.
The jurisdictional piece is a very serious one. In addition to the funds not going to the creator and not going to those who are taking the financial risk, I'll note that when the money does leave the jurisdiction, it also means it's no longer part of our tax base. There are all kinds of considerations that come into play. We lose our ability to provide customer service. If an event is cancelled or postponed for any reason, or we have to provide specific instructions for patrons, we have absolutely no ability to find them and work through that.
The challenges are numerous.
We recognize that the secondary market exists, and in the absence of enforcement, we recognize that it will continue to exist. Our interest is very much in protecting the consumer and ensuring the transaction is a safe one and that the patron will get into the venue.
There are basically three realities out there right now.
There's the reality of purchasing on the secondary market from a reseller that has the ability to authenticate the ticket. For example, Ticketmaster's platform can do that, if they are the original seller of the ticket.
Then you have the platforms that can't guarantee it's a real ticket but that offer you a money-back guarantee. StubHub is a good example of that. They cannot guarantee that you will get into the event, but if you can't, you will get your money back.
Then there's the third, which is represented by the out-of-region resellers or the person on Kijiji who took a print-at-home ticket and photocopied it 50 times to sell it.